<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Just Security</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.justsecurity.org</provider_url><title>The Updated First Geneva Convention Commentary, DOD&#x2019;s Law of War Manual, and a More Perfect Law of War: Part III - Just Security</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="epv65LQYYr"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.justsecurity.org/32989/updated-geneva-convention-commentary-dods-law-war-manual-perfect-law-war-part-iii/"&gt;The Updated First Geneva Convention Commentary, DOD&#x2019;s Law of War Manual, and a More Perfect Law of War: Part III&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.justsecurity.org/32989/updated-geneva-convention-commentary-dods-law-war-manual-perfect-law-war-part-iii/embed/#?secret=epv65LQYYr" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;The Updated First Geneva Convention Commentary, DOD&#x2019;s Law of War Manual, and a More Perfect Law of War: Part III&#x201D; &#x2014; Just Security" data-secret="epv65LQYYr" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>This third post of a series on the ICRC&#x2019;s Updated Commentary on the First Geneva Convention of 1949 offers some concluding observations and further comparisons with the recent DoD Law of War Manual, as well as thoughts on what each might mean for law-of-war interpretation. Sharp debate will surely arise concerning competing conclusions from the [&hellip;]</description><thumbnail_url>https://i0.wp.com/www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/blue-logo.png?fit=178%2C60&amp;ssl=1</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>178</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>60</thumbnail_height></oembed>
